4.5 Article

Tear glucose analysis for the noninvasive detection and monitoring of diabetes mellitus

Journal

OCULAR SURFACE
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 280-293

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70094-0

Keywords

conjunctiva; contact lens sensors; diabetes mellitus; glucose sensing; glucose transport; in situ tear analysis; tear collection; tear glucose; tear production; tear stimulation

Categories

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [2 R01 EB004132-04, 1 F31 EB004181-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One approach to the noninvasive monitoring of blood glucose concentration is to monitor glucose concentrations in tear fluid. While several methods for sensing glucose in tear fluid have been proposed, controversy remains as to the precise concentrations of tear glucose in normal and diabetic subjects and as to whether tear fluid glucose concentrations correlate with blood glucose concentrations. This review covers the present understanding of the physiology of glucose transport in tears, the regulation of the aqueous tear fraction, and studies of tear glucose concentration over the last 80 years. The various tear collection methods employed greatly influence the measured tear glucose concentrations. Studies that involve mechanical irritation of the conjunctiva during sampling measure the highest tear glucose concentrations, while studies that avoid tear stimulation measure the lowest concentrations. Attempts to monitor tear glucose concentration in situ by using contact lens-based sensing devices are discussed, and new observations are presented of tear glucose concentration obtained by a method designed to avoid tear stimulation. These studies indicate the importance of the sampling method in determining tear glucose concentrations. On the basis of these results, we discuss the future of in vivo tear glucose sensing and outline the studies needed to resolve the remaining questions about the relationship between tear and blood glucose concentrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available