4.7 Article

Higher prevalence of elevated albumin excretion in youth with type 2 than type I diabetes

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 2593-2598

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0450

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01RR00037, M01RR01070, M01RR001271, M01RR00069, M01RR08084] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [DP-05-069] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - To estimate the prevalence of an elevated albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) (>= 30 mu g/mg) among youth with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and to identify factors associated with elevated ACR and their effect on the relationship between elevated ACR and type of diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Cross-sectional data were analyzed from 259 participants with onset of diabetes at < 20 years of age in the SEARCH for Diabetes in 3, Youth, a multicenter observational study of diabetes in youth. Multiple logistic regression was used to explore determinants of elevated ACR and factors accounting for differences in this prevalence between type 2 and type I diabetes. RESULTS- The prevalence of elevated ACR was 9.2% in type 1 and 22.2% in type 2 diabetes (prevalence ratio 2.4 [95% Cl 1.9-3.0]; P < 0.0001). In multiple logistic regression analysis, female sex, ACR and triglyceride values, hypertension, and type of diabetes (type 2 versus type 1) were significantly associated with elevated ACR. Adjustment for variables related to insulin resistance (obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and inflammation)attenuated,but did not comletely explain, the association of diabetes type wit CONCLUSIONS - Youth with type 2 diabetes have a higher prevalence of elevated ACR than youth with type I diabetes, in an association that apparently does not completely depend on age, duration of diabetes, race/ethnicity, sex, level of glycemic control, or features of insulin resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available