3.9 Article

Erythropoietin levels in lowlanders and high-altitude natives at 3450 m

Journal

AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 78, Issue 10, Pages 963-967

Publisher

AEROSPACE MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.2085.2007

Keywords

high altitude; erythropoietin; high altitude natives; high altitude pulmonary edema; acute mountain sickness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study is aimed to determine whether short or prolonged residency at high altitude (HA) elicits erythropoietin (EPO) secretion effectively in subjects who were able to acclimatize and those who were not able to acclimatize and suffered from acute mountain sickness (AMS) and high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE). Methods: Plasma EPO was measured in 16 lowland residents (LLR) at sea level (SL) and during 11 d of their sojourn at an altitude of 3450 m. Identical studies were also conducted in LLR acclimatized to HA (LLR-accl), high altitude natives (HAN) and in patients of AMS and HAPE. Results: In LLR at SL, the mean SD EPO levels were 8.93 +/- 3.75 mU center dot ml(-1), increased significantly after 8 h (20.0 +/- 11.06) of arrival at HA, peaked by day 1 (27.91 +/- 10.74 mU center dot ml(-1)), and started declining thereafter. The hemoglobin and hernatocrit also increased after 8 h of arrival at HA and the increased levels were maintained during sojourn at high altitude. The EPO levels in LLR-accl were found to be significantly higher than the LLR SL values, but were not significantly different in HAN. The EPO levels in patients of AMS were not significantly different than the LLR values during the initial 2 d after arrival at HA but were found to be increased in patients of HAPE. Conclusion: Short or prolonged residency at HA is associated with increased secretion of EPO. The EPO response to hypoxia is not significantly altered in AMS but is markedly enhanced in HAPE, which may be due to exaggerated hypoxemia in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available