4.6 Article

Platelet function to estimate the bleeding risk in autoimmune thrombocytopenia

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 814-819

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01855.x

Keywords

autoimmune thrombocytopenia; bleeding score; cone and plate analyzer; high shear condition; platelet function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Knowledge of platelet function may assist in patient care in chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenia (cAITP). Materials and methods We evaluated the association of platelet function with haemorrhage in 41 patients, median age 41 years (range 14-82 years, 24 females) with chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenia (cAITP). Samples were investigated for platelet P-selectin, and adhesion and aggregate formation under high shear conditions. Data were compared to those from 28 healthy controls (median age 39 years, range 23-70 years, 17 females) and correlated with a bleeding score of 0 (no bleeding) to 3 (overt mucosal bleedings). Results P-selectin levels were higher in patients than in controls (P < 0.0004). Compared to controls, the patients' samples responded to high shear with decreased adhesion to the polystyrene surface (P < 0.0001), but formed aggregates of normal size. P-selectin expression was neither correlated with platelet counts, nor platelet adhesion, nor the bleeding score. Only the size of formed aggregates correlated with P-selectin (P = 0.01). Platelet counts (odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.88; P = 0.04) and adhesion (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.87; P = 0.04) were independently inversely correlated with bleeding symptoms. Conclusion Platelet adhesion correlates with bleeding symptoms, while the size of aggregates that are formed under high shear correlates with in vivo platelet activation. The determination of these parameters may assist in estimating an individual bleeding risk and thus a decision for treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available