4.5 Article

Gemcitabine administered as a short infusion versus a fixed dose rate in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 80-87

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.05.004

Keywords

non-small cell lung cancer; fixed dose rate; gemcitabine; cisplatin; Chemotherapy; randomised trial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have indicated that, in combination with cisplatin, fixed dose rate gemcitabine may be more efficacious than standard infusion gemcitabine. This open-label, randomised phase II study was aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these regimens as treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Latin American patients. Sixty-four patients were randomised to receive up to six cycles of treatment with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1 plus either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on Days 1 and 8 of a 21 -day cycle (standard arm, N = 33) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min on Days 1 and 8 of a 21 -day cycle (FDR arm, N= 31). In the standard arm, 9 of 33 (27%) patients responded compared with 6 of 30 (20%) patients in the FDR arm (odds ratio: 0.67, 95% Cl, 0.21-2.2; p = 0.56). Median overall survival was 7.5 months in the standard arm and 9.9 months in the FDR arm. One-year survival rates were 35% and 37% in the standard arm and the FDR

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available