4.6 Article

The botanist effect revisited: Plant species richness, county area, and human population size in the United States

Journal

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 1333-1340

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00760.x

Keywords

biogeography; density-area relationship; habitat heterogeneity; macroecology; native and exotic plants; North American flora; sampling effort; species-area relationship; species-energy relationship; urban ecology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The botanist effect is thought to be the reason for higher plant species richness in areas where botanists are disproportionately present as an artefactual consequence of a more thorough sampling. We examined whether this was the case for US. counties. We collated the number of species of vascular plants, human population size, and the area of US. counties. Controlling for spatial autocorrelation and county area, plant species richness increased with human population size and density in counties with and without universities and/or botanical gardens, with no significant differences in the relation between the two subsets. This is consistent with previous findings and further evidence of a broad-scale positive correlation between species richness and human population presence, which has important consequences for the experience of nature by inhabitants of densely populated regions. Combined with the many reports of a negative correlation between the two variables at a local scale, the positive relation between plant species richness in US. counties and human population presence stresses the need for the conservation of seminatural areas in urbanized ecosystems and for the containment of urban and suburban sprawl.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available