3.9 Article

Surgical target selection in cerebral glioma surgery: Linking methionine (MET) PET image fusion and neuronavigation

Journal

MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 273-280

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-991143

Keywords

glioma surgery; image fusion; MET PET; neuronavigation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective:. The objective of this study was to investigate the histological correlate of C-11-methionine (MET) PET uptake of brain gliomas by image fusion for navigated surgery. Methods: Twenty-seven patients (18 male, 9 female; mean age 42 years; range 11-77 years; 8 low-grade and 11 high-grade astrocytomas or mixed gliomas, 8 oligodendrogliomas) underwent MET PET studies preoperatively. Results: MET PET tumor uptake was detected in 26 of 27 patients (96.3%). The quantitative MET tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) ratio was significantly higher in malignant gliomas and oligodendrogliomas than in low-grade gliomas (2.76/2.62 vs. 1.67, p=0.03). Generally, qualitative visual grading of MET uptake revealed 2 main patterns: focal MET uptake in 12 and uniform global MET uptake in 11 patients. Focal uptake corresponded to malignant glioma histology in 66.7%, and uniform global uptake to oligodendroglial histology in 72.7%. In oligodendrogliomas, global MET uptake constituted 81.5% (range 53.8-135%) of the MRI T-1 tumor volume on average and was limited to the MRI FLAIR tumor volume in 86 % (7/8) of patients. Tissue samples of focal MET uptake areas correlated with histological anaplasia in 66.6% (8/12 glioma patients), although 62.5% (5/8 patients) lacked MRI contrast enhancement. Conclusion: MET PET image fusion may facilitate the targeting of anaplastic foci in homogeneous MRI non-enhancing gliomas for biopsy, may identify oligodendroglial histology preoperatively as well as characterize biologically active tumor volumes within MRI T-1/FLAIR tumor areas of candidate patients for resection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available