4.6 Article

XMM-Newton and INTEGRAL observations of the black hole candidate XTE J1817-330

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 473, Issue 2, Pages 561-568

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077360

Keywords

stars : binaries; X-rays : individual : XTE J1817-330; stars : binaries : close

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. The galactic black hole candidate XTE J1817-330 was discovered in outburst by RXTE in January 2006. We present here the results of an XMM-Newton target of opportunity observation, performed on 13 March 2006 ( 44 days after the maximum), and an INTEGRAL observation performed on 15-18 February 2006 ( 18 days after the maximum). Methods. The EPIC-pn camera on-board XMM-Newton was used in the fast read-out burst mode to avoid photon pile-up, while the RGS was used in spectroscopy high count rate mode. We fit both the XMM-Newton and the INTEGRAL spectra with a two-component model consisting of a thermal accretion disk ( represented by diskbb or diskpn models) and a comptonizing hot corona ( represented by a power-law or the compTT model). Results. The soft X-ray spectrum is dominated by an accretion disk component, with a maximum temperature decreasing from 0.96 +/- 0.04 keV at the time of the INTEGRAL observation to 0.70 +/- 0.01 keV on 13 March. The optical monitors on board INTEGRAL and XMM-Newton showed the source with magnitudes V: 11.3-11.4, U: 15.0-15.1 and UVW1:14.7-14.8. The soft X-ray spectrum, together with the optical and UV data, show a low hydrogen column density towards the source, and several absorption lines, most likely of interstellar origin, are detected in the RGS spectrum: OIK alpha, OIK beta, OII, OIII and OVII, which trace both cold and hot components of the interstellar medium. The soft X-ray spectrum indicates the presence of a black hole, with an estimate for the upper limit of the mass of 6.0(-2.5)(+4.0)M(circle dot).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available