4.7 Article

Integrated membrane protein analysis of mature and embryonic stem cell-derived smooth muscle cells using a novel combination of CyDye/biotin labeling

Journal

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 1788-1797

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M600433-MCP200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cultivated vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were surface-labeled with CyDyes followed by biotinylation. After enrichment on avidin columns, proteins were separated on large format gradient gels by SDS-PAGE. A comparison between CyDye-tagged and non-tagged gel bands revealed a substantial increase of protein identifications from membrane, membrane-associated, and extracellular matrix proteins with a corresponding reduction in co-purified intracellular proteins. Notably the majority of identified proteins were involved in cellular adhesion processes. To demonstrate the quantitative potential of this platform, we performed a comparison between mature and embryonic stem cell-derived smooth muscle cells (esSMCs) and identified the membrane proteins E-cadherin, integrin alpha 6, and CD98( 4F2) to be significantly up-regulated in esSMCs suggesting that SMCs derived from embryonic stem cells maintain characteristics of their embryonic stem cell origin. This was subsequently confirmed by RT-PCR: despite expressing a panel of smooth muscle markers (calponin, Sm22, and aortic smooth muscle actin), esSMCs remained positive for markers of stem cell pluripotency (Oct4, Nanog, and Rex1). In summary, we describe a novel strategy for the profiling of cell membrane proteins. The procedure combines DIGE technology with biotin/avidin labeling to discriminate membrane and membrane-associated proteins from intracellular contaminants by fluorescence tagging and permits semiquantitative differential expression analysis of membrane proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available