4.5 Article

Predictive value of alexithyrnia in patients with eating disorders: A 3-year prospective study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 365-370

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.03.008

Keywords

Alexithymia; depression; eating disorders; longitudinal study; outcome predictors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Several cross-sectional studies have reported high levels of alexithyrnia in populations with eating disorders. However, only few studies, fraught with multiple methodological biases, have assessed the prognostic value of alexithymic features in these disorders. The aim of the present study was to investigate the long-term prognostic value of alexithymic features in a sample of patients with eating disorders. Methods: Within the framework of a European research project on eating disorders (INSERM Network No. 494013), we conducted a 3-year longitudinal study exploring a sample of 102 DSM-IV eating disorder patients using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Beck Depression Inventory. Results: At the 3-year assessment, 74% (n=76) of the sample still presented a syndromal or subsyndromal eating disorder (unfavorable outcome: score of >= 3 on the Psychiatric Status Rating Scale for anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa). In logistic and hierarchical regression analyses, the Difficulty Identifying Feelings factor of the TAS-20 emerged as a significant predictor of treatment outcome, independent of depressive symptoms and eating disorder severity. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that difficulty in identifying feelings can act as a negative prognostic factor of the long-term outcome of patients with eating disorders. Professionals should carefully monitor emotional identification and expression in patients with eating disorders and develop specific strategies to encourage labeling and sharing of emotions. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available