4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Methodologic challenges to studying patient safety and comparative effectiveness

Journal

MEDICAL CARE
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages S13-S15

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318041f752

Keywords

comparative effectiveness; bias; confounding

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [HHSA290200500361] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of patient safety and comparative effectiveness entail unique methodologic challenges. These studies may be susceptible to systematic error, including selection bias, exposure misclassification, and outcome misclassification. They may also be vulnerable to random error, or confounding by a variable such as another drug, a disease, or the drug indication itself. Finally, special logistical issues can arise, including data access problems, difficulties in conveying the need for studies of certain interventions, and obstacles to gaining institutional review board approval. This article provides a conceptual overview of these methodologic issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available