4.6 Article

Stress and HPA-axis functioning in young people at ultra high risk for psychosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 561-569

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.05.010

Keywords

cortisol; MRI; psychosis; ultra high risk; stress; schizophrenia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is thought that hypothalamic-pituitary-ad renal (HPA) axis functioning mediates between the experience of stress and development of psychotic symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate this model in a cohort of young people at ultra high risk (UHR) of psychosis. Information about the experience of psychological symptoms and recent stressful experiences was obtained from 23 young people who met UHR criteria. Plasma samples were taken to assess cortisol and glucocorticoid receptor numbers, and an MRI scan was also performed. Plasma cortisol levels were significantly and positively correlated with the experience of 'hassles' but not with the experience of stressful life events. Significant positive associations were also found between plasma cortisol levels and level of depression and anxiety. No significant relationships were found between plasma cortisol level and global psychopathology, psychotic symptomatology, functioning or pituitary and hippocampal volumes. These results suggest that the number of hassles experienced by young people at UHR of psychosis could be an important factor in raising their cortisol levels, which might, in turn, affect the severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms. No other relationships were found between plasma cortisol levels and the experience of psychotic symptoms, functioning or hippocampal and pituitary volumes. These results indicate possible impairment in HPA-axis functioning in the early stages of psychotic illness, but further investigation of the relationships between these parameters is required. Crown Copyright (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available