4.7 Article

Single oral challenge by advanced glycation end products acutely impairs endothelial function in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 2579-2582

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0320

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-09453] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - The current study was designed to test the acute effects of dietary advanced glycation end products (AGES) on endothelial function of diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery and serum levels of AGES, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and glucose were assessed before and after a single oral AGE challenge (similar to 1.8 X 106 AGE units) in 44 diabetic and 10 nondiabetic subjects. RESULTS - The diabetic patients had higher baseline levels of serum AGES (P = 0.020), PAI-1 (NS), and VCAM-1 (P = 0.033) and lower baseline values of FMD compared with nondiabetic subjects (P = 0.032). Ninety minutes after a single oral AGE challenge, serum AGES and PAI-1 levels increased and FMD decreased significantly in both healthy subjects (AGES: 7.2 +/- 0.5 to 9.3 +/- 1 units/ml, P = 0.014; PAI-1: 5.4 +/- 0.4 to 6.8 +/- 0.4 ng/ml, P = 0.007; and FMD: 9.9 +/- 0.7 to 7.4 +/- 0.9%, P = 0.019) and diabetic subjects (AGES: 10.5 +/- 0.7 to 14.2 +/- 1 units/ml, P = 0.020; PAI-1: 6.5 +/- 1 to 10 +/- 2 ng/ml, P = 0.030; and FMD: 5.4 +/- 0.4 to 4.0 +/- 0.3%, P = 0.032). Serum glucose and VCAM-1 levels remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS - Significant increases in serum AGES can occur together with altered clinical measures of endothelial function in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects after a single modest AGE-rich beverage. Thus, repeated or chronic exposure to high AGE diets could over time lead to and/or accelerate vascular disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available