4.7 Article

Effect of long-term manuring and fertilizers on carbon pools, soil structure, and sustainability under different cropping systems in wet-temperate zone of northwest Himalayas

Journal

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 235-240

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-007-0207-9

Keywords

carbon pools; cropping systems; manures and fertilizers; structural stability; soil sustainability

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated C management index (CMI; an indicator of sustainability of a management system and is based on total and labile C) and soil aggregation in medium-textured soils (silt loam and silty clay loam) under different cropping systems as follows: maize-wheat (M-W), rice-wheat (R-W), soybean-wheat (S-W), Guinea grass, and Setaria grass. Field experiments were 6-32 years long and were located in the wet-temperate zone of northwest Himalayas. The plant nutrients were applied through chemical fertilizers (urea, superphosphate, and muriate of potash) with or without organic materials (FYM, wheat straw, and Lantana spp.). The content of total C (C-T), labile C (C-L), CMI, mean weight diameter (MWD), and aggregate porosity varied significantly under different cropping systems. The range was 1.59 (R-W)-4.29% (Setaria) for C-T, 1.23 (R-W)-3.89 mg/kg (Guinea grass) for C-L, 52.09 (R-W)-129.77 (Guinea grass) for CMI, 0.90 (R-W)-5.09 (Guinea grass) for MWD, and 41.5 (R-W)-56.8% (S-W) for aggregate porosity. Aggregate porosity was highest (56.8%) under S-W, followed by grasses (50.1-51.2%), and M/R-W (41.5-50.0%). As per these data, (a) continuous use of N alone as urea lowered soil sustainability over control (no fertilizers); (b) use of NPK at recommended rates improved soil productivity over control; (c) the NPK + organic amendments further improved soil sustainability; and (d) the sustainability under different cropping systems followed the order: perennial grasses > soybean-wheat > maize-wheat > rice-wheat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available