4.5 Article

A sensitive assay for measuring SMN mRNA levels in peripheral blood and in muscle samples of patients affected with spinal muscular atrophy

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 1054-1062

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201885

Keywords

spinal muscular atrophy; SMN transcripts; clinical trials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different therapeutic strategies are currently evaluated in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) that are aimed at increasing full-length (FL) mRNA levels produced from the SMN2 gene. Assays measuring SMN mRNA levels are needed. We have developed a sensitive, comparative assay based on multiplex fluorescent reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) that can measure, in the same reaction, the levels of SMN mRNA with and without exon 7 sequences as well as those of total SMN mRNA. This assay allows to calculate directly the ratios of FL SMN mRNA to SMN mRNA without exon 7 (Delta 7). We have used this assay to compare the levels of SMN transcripts in the blood of 75 unrelated normal subjects and of 48 SMA patients, and in muscle samples of 8 SMA patients. The SMN1 and the SMN2 genes produced very similar levels of total mRNA. Levels of transcripts lacking exon 7 were linearly dependent on the number of SMN2 copies, both in SMA patients and in controls. In patients, FL mRNA levels correlated with SMN2 copy number. A significant but weaker inverse correlation was also observed between FL or Delta 7 mRNA levels and disease severity, but patients with three SMN2 copies and different SMA types displayed similar mRNA levels. A significantly higher FL to Delta 7 ratio was measured in blood cells than in skeletal muscle (0.80 +/- 0.18 versus 0.47 +/- 0.11). This assay can be used as a sensitive biomarker for monitoring the effects of various drugs in forthcoming clinical trials of SMA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available