4.4 Article

Differences in inflammatory pain in nNOS-, iNOS- and eNOS-deficient mice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 810-818

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.12.008

Keywords

hyperalgesia; allodynia; behavioural testing; nitric oxide synthase; knockout; calcitonin gene related peptide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the relative importance of the isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in inflammatory pain, we directly compared pain behaviour and paw thickness after intraplantar injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) in wild-type (WT) mice and in mice lacking either inducible (iNOS), endothelial (eNOS) or neuronal NOS (nNOS). In mice deficient for nNOS, thermal hyperalgesia was reduced by approximately 50% compared to wild type mice at 4 and 8 It after CFA injection, and mechanical hypersensitivity was absent. The only change in pain behaviour in iNOS and eNOS deficient mice compared to WT mice was a more rapid recovery from thermal hyperalgesia. A compensatory up-regulation of nNOS in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and spinal cords of iNOS and eNOS knockout mice was excluded using RT-PCR. However, an increase of iNOS gene expression was found in spinal cords of eNOS and nNOS deficient mice. To study the downstream effects of nNOS deficiency on DRG neurones, we assessed their immunoreactivity for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and cytokines. We found a significant reduction in the CFA induced increase in CGRP inummoreactive neurotics as well as in CGRP gene expression in nNOS deficient mice, whereas the percentage of cells immunopositive for tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) was unchanged. These results support the proposed role of nNOS in sensitization of DRG neurones, and might indicate that CGRP is involved in this process. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available