4.2 Article

Regressive evolution: ontogeny and genetics of cavefish eye rudimentation

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages 287-296

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00840.x

Keywords

Astyanax; eye genes; growth allometries; introgressive hybridization; mutation pressure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two hypotheses exist to explain ontogenetic eye reduction in Astyanax cave fish: first, after lens induction by the primordial eye cup, the lens plays the role of a central regulator of eye and retina regression or, second, the retina itself is an independent unit of eye development. A comparative study of five blind cave fish populations and their surface sister form was performed to investigate the differences of ontogenetic eye regression between the cave populations during different stages of development. The study revealed that, in addition to the initial formation of smaller primordia, eye regression is also caused during later ontogeny by different relative growth and specific histological characteristics. Whereas the cave fish lens never properly differentiates, the regressive process of the retina is transitorily interrupted by ongoing differentiation. In the newly-discovered Molino cave population, even visual cells with well-organized outer segments develop, which are secondarily reduced at a later ontogenetic stage. This result shows that the retina and lens are independent developmental units within the eye ball. Presumably, the genetic systems responsible for both show independent inheritance, which is also corroborated by hybrids of F-2-crosses between the cave and surface fish, in which lens and retina development do not correlate. During ontogeny, the eye size differs between the cave populations. In Pachon cave fish, the relatively large eye size correlates with an ancient introgression from a surface population, which may have delayed eye regression. (C) 2007 The Linnean Society of London,.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available