3.9 Article

Internal and surface-localized major surface proteases of Leishmania spp. and their differential release from promastigotes

Journal

EUKARYOTIC CELL
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 1905-1912

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00073-07

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI067874, R21 AI032135, R01 AI059451, R01 AI032135, R01 AI048822, R01 AI32135, R01 AI045540] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Major surface protease (MSP), also called GP63, is a virulence factor of Leishmania spp. protozoa. There are three pools of MSP, located either internally within the parasite, anchored to the surface membrane, or released into the extracellular environment. The regulation and biological functions of these MSP pools are unknown. We investigated here the trafficking and extrusion of surface versus internal MSPs. Virulent Leishmania chagasi undergo a growth-associated lengthening in the t(1/2) of surface-localized MSP, but this did not occur in the attenuated L5 strain. The release of surface-localized MSP was enhanced in a dose-dependent manner by M beta CD, which chelates membrane cholesterol-ergosterol. Furthermore, incubation of promastigotes at 37 degrees C with Matrigel matrix, a soluble basement membrane extract of Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm tumor cells, stimulated the release of internal MSP but not of surface-located MSP. Taken together, these data indicate that MSP subpopulations in distinct cellular locations are released from the parasite under different environmental conditions. We hypothesize that the internal MSP with its lengthy t(1/2) does not serve as a pool for promastigote surface MSP in the sand fly vector but that it instead functions as an MSP pool ready for quick release upon inoculation of metacyclic promastigotes into mammals. We present a model in which these different MSP pools are released under distinct life cycle-specific conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available