4.7 Article

High-fat diet up-regulates caveolin-1 expression in aorta of diet-induced obese but not in diet-resistant rats

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages 167-174

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.05.028

Keywords

high-fat diet; obesity; diet-resistance; caveolin-1; endothelial nitric oxide synthase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) is considered as a negative regulator of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and influences various cardiovascular functions. The objective of the study is to investigate the effects of high-fat diet on vascular Cav-1 expression and eNOS activities. Methods: Male outbred Sprague-Dawley rats were fed with a high-fat diet for 15 weeks to induce obesity. The diet-induced obese (DIO) rats were then divided into two groups. One group (DIO-LF) was fed a normal diet and another group (DIO-HF) along with diet-resistance (DR) rats were fed a high-fat diet for 8 more weeks. Cav-1 expression was determined using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry techniques. NOS activities were assessed using Griess reagents. Protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) and eNOS expression and phosphorylation were determined by Western blotting. Results: A high-fat diet up-regulated Cav-1 and down-regulated eNOS expression in aorta of DID rats, but not in that of DR rats. These effects were reversed in DID rats after switching to a low-fat diet for 8 weeks. Decreased NOS activities in aortas were observed in DIO rats, but not in DR rats. Phosphorylation of PKB/Akt and eNOS (Ser1177) were enhanced in aortas of DID rats of both DIO-HF and DIO-LF groups. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the decrease of vascular NOS activities in rats fed a high-fat diet were due, at least in part, to the upregulation of Cav-1 expression. (C) 2007 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available