4.4 Article

A cucumber mosaic virus mutant lacking the 2b counter-defence protein gene provides protection against wild-type strains

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 2862-2871

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.83138-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several plant virus mutants, in which genes encoding silencing suppressor proteins have been deleted, are known to induce systemic or localized RNA silencing against themselves and other RNA molecules containing homologous sequences. Thus, it is thought that many cases of cross-protection, in which infection with a mild or asymptomatic; virus mutant protects plants against challenge infection with closely related virulent viruses, can be explained by RNA silencing. We found that a cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) mutant of the subgroup A strain Fny (Fny-CMV Delta 2b), which cannot express the 2b silencing suppressor protein, cross-protects tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and Nicotiana benthamiana plants against disease induction by wild-type Fny-CMV. However, protection is most effective only if inoculation with Fny-CMV Delta 2b and challenge inoculation with wild-type CMV Occurs on the same leaf. Unexpectedly, Fny-CMV Delta 2b also protected plants against infection with TC-CMV, a subgroup II strain that is not closely related to Fny-CMV. Additionally, in situ hybridization revealed that Fny-CMV Delta 2b and Fny-CMV can co-exist in the same tissues but these tissues contain zones of Fny-CMV Delta 2b-infected host cells from which Fny-CMV appears to be excluded. Taken together, it appears unlikely that cross-protection by Fny-CMV Delta 2b occurs by induction of systemic RNA silencing against itself and homologous RNA sequences in wild-type CMV. It is more likely that protection occurs through either induction of very highly localized RNA silencing, or by competition between strains for host cells or resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available