4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Mixed lineage kinase inhibitor CEP-1347 fails to delay disability in early Parkinson disease

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 15, Pages 1480-1490

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277648.63931.c0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR000052] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: CEP-1347 inhibits mixed lineage kinases that activate apoptotic pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease ( PD). CEP-1347 enhances neuronal survival in a variety of nonclinical models and was found to be safe and well tolerated during 4 weeks in PD patients. We conducted the Parkinson Research Examination of CEP-1347 Trial ( PRECEPT) to assess its disease-modifying potential in early PD. Methods: Consenting PD patients not yet requiring dopaminergic therapy ( n = 806) were randomized equally to CEP-1347 in dosages of 10 mg BID, 25 mg BID, or 50 mg BID, or matching placebo, and were evaluated blindly and prospectively. The primary clinical end point was time to the development of disability requiring dopaminergic therapy. Secondary end points included changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale ( UPDRS) and beta-CIT SPECT imaging of striatal dopamine transporters. Results: The study was concluded early, after an average of 21.4 months of follow-up, when a planned interim analysis demonstrated that it would be futile to continue experimental treatment. At that time, 108 of 191 subjects randomized to placebo ( 57%) had reached the primary end point of disability requiring dopaminergic therapy compared with active CEP-1347: 133 of 205 ( 65%) on 10 mg BID, 126 of 212 ( 59%) on 25 mg BID, and 127 of 198 ( 64%) on 50 mg BID. Changes in UPDRS scores and beta-CIT imaging showed similar patterns. Conclusions: In contrast to research in animal models that predicted favorable disease-modifying outcomes, we found CEP-1347 to be an ineffective treatment in early Parkinson disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available