4.7 Article

Radio galaxies in the 2SLAQ Luminous Red Galaxy Survey -: I.: The evolution of low-power radio galaxies to z ∼ 0.7

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 381, Issue 1, Pages 211-227

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12231.x

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : luminosity function, mass function; radio continuum : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have combined optical data from the 2dF-SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) LRG(Luminous Red Galaxy) and QSO (quasi-stellar object) (2SLAQ) redshift survey with radio measurements from the 1.4 GHz VLA (Very Large Array) FIRST (Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-cm) and NVSS (NRAO VLA Sky Survey) surveys to identify a volume-limited sample of 391 radio galaxies at redshift 0.4 < z < 0.7. By determining an accurate radio luminosity function for luminous early-type galaxies in this redshift range, we can investigate the cosmic evolution of the radio-galaxy population over a wide range in radio luminosity. The low-power radio galaxies in our LRG sample (those with 1.4 GHz radio luminosities in the range 10(24) to 10(25) W Hz(-1), corresponding to Fanaroff -Riley I (FR I) radio galaxies in the local Universe) undergo significant cosmic evolution over the redshift range 0 < z < 0.7, consistent with pure luminosity evolution of the form (1 + z)(k), where k = 2.0 +/- 0.3. Our results appear to rule out (at the 6-7 sigma level) models in which low-power radio galaxies undergo no cosmic evolution. The most powerful radio galaxies in our sample (with radio luminosities above 10(26) W Hz(-1)) may undergo more rapid evolution over the same redshift range. The evolution seen in the low-power radio-galaxy population implies that the total energy input into massive early-type galaxies from active galactic nucleus (AGN) heating increases with redshift, and was at least 50 per cent higher at z similar to 0.55 (the median redshift of the 2SLAQ LRG sample) than in the local universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available