4.6 Article

Alternatively spliced T-cell receptor transcripts are up-regulated in response to disruption of either splicing elements or reading frame

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 282, Issue 41, Pages 29738-29747

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M704372200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-058595] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonsense mutations create premature termination codons ( PTCs), leading to the generation of truncated proteins, some of which have deleterious gain-of-function or dominant-negative activity. Protecting cells from such aberrant proteins is nonsensemediated decay ( NMD), an RNA surveillance pathway that degrades transcripts harboring PTCs. Asecond response to nonsense mutations is the up-regulation of alternatively spliced transcripts that skip the PTC. This nonsense-associated altered splicing ( NAS) response has the potential to rescue protein function, but the mechanism by which it is triggered has been controversial. Some studies suggest that, like NMD, NAS is triggered as a result of nonsense mutations disrupting reading frame, whereas other studies suggest thatNASis triggered when nonsense mutations disrupt exonic splicing enhancers ( ESEs). Using T-cell receptor-beta( TCR beta), which naturally acquires PTCs at high frequency, we provide evidence that both mechanisms act on a single type of mRNA. Mutations that disrupt consensus ESE sites up-regulated an alternatively spliced TCR beta transcript that skipped the mutations independently of reading frame disruption and the NMD factor UPF1. In contrast, reading frame disrupting mutations that did not disrupt consensus ESE sites elicited UPF1-dependent up-regulation of the alternatively spliced TCR beta transcript. Restoration of reading frame prevented this up-regulation. Our results suggest that the response of an mRNA to a nonsense mutation depends on its context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available