4.7 Article

Early steps in layer-by-layer construction of polyelectrolyte films:: The transition from surface/polymer to polymer/polymer determining interactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 314, Issue 2, Pages 358-366

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.05.060

Keywords

polyelectrolyte multilayers; layer-by-layer adsorption; pH influence; ionic strength influence; poly(acrylic acid); poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate chloride)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The layer-by-layer deposition of two polyelectrolytes, quaternized poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate chloride) (MADQUAT) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) on a silica substrate was investigated using optical reflectometry, as a function of pH (pH 4, 5.5 and 9), ionic strength (10(-3) to 10(-1) M) and type of salt. Attention was given to the successive deposited weights and to the corresponding deposited charge densities within the ten first deposited layers. Results show a change of growth regime between an early stage where the substrate had a dominating influence in the build-up and a second stage where the polymer uptake was ruled essentially by poly i ner-pol ymer interactions. The pH was seen to influence the growth via the charge densities of silica (first stage) and PAA (first and second stages). The increase of NaCl concentration induced an increase of the film weight between 10(-3) and 10(-2) M, but the trend was more sophisticated between 10(-2) and 10(-1) NI where the polymer uptake increased in the first stage of the growth and decreased in subsequent layers. The film weight increased in accordance with the rank of ions in the Hofmeister series. AFM images revealed a heterogeneous film morphology with bumps and valleys, which was explained by a growth mechanism made of the successive formation and growth of polymer complexes. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available