4.7 Article

Chronic carbamazepine administration reduces N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-initiated signaling via arachidonic acid in rat brain

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 62, Issue 8, Pages 934-943

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.04.021

Keywords

arachidonic acid; bipolar disorder; carbamazepine; NMDA; phospholipase A(2); prostaglandin E-2

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 AG999999] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Lithium and carbamazepine (CBZ) are used to treat mania in bipolar disorder. When given chronically to rats, both agents reduce arachidonic acid (AA) turnover in brain phospholipids and downstream AA metabolism. Lithium in rats also attenuates brain N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) signaling via AA. We hypothesized that, like chronic lithium, chronic CBZ administration to rats would reduce NMDAR-mediated signaling via AA. Methods: We used our fatty acid method with quantitative autoradiography to image the regional brain incorporation coefficient k* of AA, a marker of AA signaling, in unanesthetized rats that had been given 25 mg/kg/day IP CBZ or vehicle for 30 days, then injected with NMIDA (25 mg/kg IP) or saline. We also measured brain concentrations of two AA metabolites, prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) and thromboxane B-2 (TXB2). Results: In chronic vehicle-treated rats, NMDA compared with saline increased k* significantly in 69 of 82 brain regions examined, but did not change k* significantly in any region in CBZ-treated rats. In vehicle- but not CBZ-treated rats, NMDA also increased brain concentrations of PGE(2) and TXB2. Conclusions: Chronic CBZ administration to rats blocks increments in the AA signal k*, and in PGE(2) and TXB2 Concentrations that are produced by NMDA in vehicle-treated rats. The clinical action of antimanic drugs might involve inhibition of brain NMDAR-mediated signaling involving AA and its metabolites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available