4.7 Article

Fatigue after treatment for early stage breast cancer - A controlled comparison

Journal

CANCER
Volume 110, Issue 8, Pages 1851-1859

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22993

Keywords

fatigue; breast cancer; adjuvant therapy; survivorship

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA82822, R01 CA082822-01, R01 CA082822] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. Evidence suggests that fatigue may be a greater problem for cancer survivors than people without cancer. The present study sought to determine whether fatigue was greater in women who had completed treatment for early-stage breast cancer relative to a demographically matched comparison group of women with no cancer history. METHODS. As part of a larger study, women with stage 0-II breast cancer were recruited before the start of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n = 100) or radiotherapy only (n = 121). Fatigue was assessed at the end of treatment and 2, 4, and 6 months later. An age- and geographically matched sample of women with no history of cancer was recruited and assessed for comparison purposes. RESULTS. Relative to comparison subjects, breast cancer survivors reported more days of fatigue in the past week at all 4 study assessments (P <.05). These differences appeared to be clinically meaningful in that a greater percentage of patients than nonpatients earned scores in the abnormal range on this measure at each assessment (P <.05). Additional analyses indicated that differences in fatigue between patients and comparison subjects were attributable primarily to heightened fatigue in women who received both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS. Findings suggest that fatigue is a greater problem for breast cancer survivors in the 6 months after completion of chemotherapy than for women with no cancer history. Future research should include longer-term follow-up to determine the persistence of fatigue in this population of survivors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available