4.7 Article

Progressive gray matter loss in patients with bipolar disorder

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 62, Issue 8, Pages 894-900

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.005

Keywords

bipolar disorder; cohort study; MRI; tensor-based morphometry

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0600429] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [G0600429] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0600429] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Structural brain abnormalities of the medial temporal lobe have been found in people with bipolar disorder (BPD). It is not known whether these abnormalities progress over the course of the illness or how they relate to neurcipsychologic functioning. We sought to address these uncertainties in a prospective cohort study of people with bipolar I disorder. Methods: Twenty patients with bipolar I disorder and 21 control subjects were recruited from the community. Participants were group matched for age, sex, and premorbid IQ. Longitudinal change in gray matter density was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging and evaluated using the technique of tensor-based morphometry with SPM2 software. Changes in gray and white matter density were estimated and compared with changes in cognitive function and clinical outcome. Results: Patients with BPD showed a larger decline in hippocampal, fusiform, and cerebellar gray matter density over 4 years than control subjects. No significant changes in white matter density were found. Reductions in temporal lobe gray matter correlated with decline in intellectual function and with the number of intervening mood episodes over the follow-up period. Conclusions: Patients with BPD lose hippocampal, fusiform and cerebellar gray matter at an accelerated rate compared with healthy control subjects. This tissue loss is associated with deterioration in cognitive function and illness course.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available