4.4 Article

Automatic sleep stage classification using two-channel electro-oculography

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 166, Issue 1, Pages 109-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.016

Keywords

sleep; sleep scoring; sleep stage; electro-oculography; ambulatory; analysis; automatic; automated; computerized

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An automatic method for the classification of wakefulness and sleep stages SREM, S 1, S2 and SWS was developed based on our two previous studies. The method is based on a two-channel electro-oculography (EOG) referenced to the left mastoid (M I). Synchronous electroencephalo-graphic (EEG) activity in S2 and SWS was detected by calculating cross-correlation and peak-to-peak amplitude difference ill the 0.5-6 Hz band between the two EOG channels. An automatic slow eye-movement (SEM) estimation was used to indicate wakefulness, SREM and S L Beta power 18-30 Hz and alpha power 8-12 Hz was also used for wakefulness detection. Synchronous 1.5-6 Hz EEG activity and absence of large eye movements was used for S I separation from SREM. Simple smoothing rules were also applied. Sleep EEG, EOG and EMG were recorded from 265 subjects. The system was tuned using data from 132 training subjects and then applied to data from 131 validation subjects that were different to the training subjects. Cohen's Kappa between the visual and the developed new automatic scoring in separating 30 s wakefulness, SREM, S 1 7 S2 and SWS epochs was substantial 0.62 with epoch by epoch agreement of 72%. With automatic subject specific alpha thresholds for offline applications results improved to 0.63 and 73%. The automatic method can be further developed and applied for ambulatory sleep recordings by using only four disposable, self-adhesive and self-applicable electrodes. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available