4.7 Article

Evaluation of molecular mechanics calculated binding energies for isolated and monolayer organic molecules on graphite

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 314, Issue 2, Pages 434-445

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.05.083

Keywords

adsorption, carbon, on; gas-solid interaction energy; molecular mechanics; binding energy; adsorption energy; adsorption, graphite, on; thermal desorption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The calculated molecule-surface binding energy, E-cal* for physical adsorption was determined using molecular mechanics MM2 parameters for cal I a model graphite surface and various organic molecules. The results for E-cal* were compared to published experimental binding energy values, E-cal* from gas chromatography (GC) or thermal desorption (TD). The binding energies from GC were for isolated molecules in the Henry's law region of adsorption, and the binding energies from TD were for molecules in monolayer coverage on a highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG). A simple desorption model was used to allow the calculation of monolayer coverage to include both molecule-surface and molecule-molecule interactions and then the results were compared to experimental values. For the 14 TD organic adsorbates (polyaromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, benzene, substituted benzenes, methane, chloroalkanes, N, N-dimethylformamide, and C60 Buckyball), the experimental versus calculated binding energies were E-cal* = 1. 1193 E-cal* and r(2) = 0.967. The GC E-cal* values were also well correlated by calculated E-cal* values for a set of I I benzene and methyl ca cal substituted benzenes and for another set of 10 alkanes and haloalkanes. The TD E-cal* mechanics computation provides a useful comparison to the ca one for GC data since adsorbate-adsorbate interactions as well as adsorbate-surface must be considered. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available