4.8 Article

Quantification of the filterability of freshwater bacteria through 0.45, 0.22, and 0.1 μm pore size filters and shape-dependent enrichment of filterable bacterial communities

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 20, Pages 7080-7086

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es0707198

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Micro-filtration is a standard process for sterilization in scientific research, medical, and industrial applications, and to remove particles in drinking water or wastewater treatment. It is generally assumed, and confirmed by quantifying filtration efficiency by plating, that filters with a 0.1 - 0.45 mu m pore size can retain bacteria. In contrast to this assumption, we have regularly observed the passage of a significant fraction of natural freshwater bacterial communities through 0.45, 0.22, and 0.1 mu m pore size filters. Flow cytometry and a regrowth assay were applied in the present study to quantify and cultivate filterable bacteria. Here we show for the first time a systematic quantification of their filterability, especially their ability to pass through 0.1,urn pore size filters. The filtered bacteria were subsequently able to grow on natural assimilable organic carbon (AOC) with specific growth rates up to 0.47 h(-1). We were able to enrich bacteria communities that pass preferentially through all three pore size filters at significantly increased percentages using successive filtration - regrowth cycles. In all instances, the dominant microbial populations comprised slender spirillum-shaped Hylemonella gracilis strains, suggesting shape-dependent selection during the filtration process. This quantification of the omnipresence of microfilterable bacterial in natural freshwater and their regrowth characteristics demand a change in the sterile filtration practice used in industrial and engineering applications as well as scientific research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available