4.8 Article

Control of corolla monosymmetry in the Brassicaceae Iberis amara

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705338104

Keywords

floral symmetry; laTCP1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Establishment of morphological novelties has contributed to the enormous diversification of floral architecture. One such novelty, flower monosymmetry, is assumed to have evolved several times independently during angiosperm evolution. To date, analysis of monosymmetry regulation has focused on species from taxa where monosymmetry prevails, such as the Lamiales and Fabaceae. In Antirrhinum majus, formation of a monosymmetric corolla is specified by the activity of the TCP transcription factors CYCLOIDEA (CYC) and DICHOTOMA (DICH). It was shown that establishment of monosymmetry likely requires an early asymmetric floral expression of CYC homologs that needs to be maintained until late floral stages. To understand how CYC homologs might have been recruited during evolution to establish monosymmetry, we characterized the likely CYC ortholog laTCP1 from Iberis amara (Brassicaceae). Species of the genus Iberis form a monosymmetric corolla, whereas the Brassicaceae are otherwise dominated by genera developing a polysymmetric corolla. Instead of four equally sized petals, L amara produces two small aclaxial and two large abaxial petals. The timing of laTCP1 expression differs from that of its Arabidopsis homolog TCP1 and other CYC homologs. laTCP1 lacks an asymmetric early expression but displays a very strong differential expression in the corolla at later floral stages, when the strongest unequal petal growth occurs. Analysis of occasionally occurring peloriciberis flower variants and comparative functional studies of TCP homologs in Arabidopsis demonstrate the importance of an altered temporal laTCP1 expression within the Brassicaceae to govern the formation of a monosymmetric corolla.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available