4.7 Article

The Lx-Yx relation:: Using galaxy cluster X-ray luminosity as a robust, low-scatter mass proxy

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 668, Issue 2, Pages 772-780

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/520831

Keywords

cosmology : observations; galaxies : clusters : general; galaxies : high-redshift; intergalactic medium; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use a sample of 115 galaxy clusters at 0.1 < z < 1.3 observed with Chandra ACIS-I to investigate the relation between luminosity and Y-X (the product of gas mass and temperature). The scatter in the relation is dominated by cluster cores, and a tight L-X-Y-X relation (11% intrinsic scatter in L-X) is recovered if sufficiently large core regions (0.15R(500)) are excluded. The intrinsic scatter is well described by a lognormal distribution, and the relations are consistent for relaxed and disturbed/merging clusters. We investigate the L-X-Y-X relation in low-quality data (e. g., for clusters detected in X-ray survey data) by estimating L-X from soft-band count rates, and find that the scatter increases somewhat to 21%. We confirm the tight correlation between Y-X and mass and the self-similar evolution of that scaling relation out to z = 0.6 for a subset of clusters in our sample with mass estimates from the literature. This is used to estimate masses for the entire sample and hence measure the L-X-M relation. We find that the scatter in the L-X-M relation is much lower than previous estimates, due to the full removal of cluster cores and more robust mass estimates. For high-redshift clusters the scatter in the L-X-M relation remains low if cluster cores are not excluded. These results suggest that cluster masses can be reliably estimated from simple luminosity measurements in low-quality data where direct mass estimates, or measurements of Y-X, are not possible. This has important applications in the estimation of cosmological parameters from X-ray cluster surveys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available