4.5 Article

The nature and timing of Palaeoproterozoic sedimentation at the southeastern margin of the Congo Craton; zircon U-Pb geochronology of plutonic, volcanic and clastic units in northern Zambia

Journal

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
Volume 159, Issue 1-2, Pages 95-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.06.004

Keywords

muva supergroup; palaeoproterozoic; bangweulu block; ubendian belt; irumide belt; detrital provenance; U-PbSHRIMP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is focused on the determination of the age and provenance of Proterozoic (meta-) sedimentary units on the southern margin of the Congo Craton, collectively known as the Muva Supergroup. Zircon U-Pb SHRIMP dating of crystalline basement units (granite and volcanic tuffs) that form the basement to the Muva Supergroup have yielded crystallisation ages of between 1868 +/- 7 and 1860 +/- 13 Ma. Discrete volcaniclastic units within the deformed portions of the Muva Supergroup in the Irumide Belt have yielded crystallisation ages of between 1879 +/- 13 and 1856 +/- 4 Ma. Detrital zircon studies in three samples of quartzite and one conglomerate from the various components of the Muva Supergroup, the Mporokoso Group on the Bangweulu Block and the Kanona and Manshya River groups in the Irumide Orogen on the southeastern margin of the Bangweulu Block, have yielded populations of Archaean and Palaeoproterozoic zircons in which the youngest detrital grains have an age of ca. 1800 Ma. These data indicate that the Muva Supergroup is a Palaeoproterozoic succession deposited at ca. 1800 Ma and that the Mporokoso, Kanona and Manshya River groups are all temporally equivalent and are likely parts of a single widespread succession. In contrast, the youngest detrital zircon in the Kasama Formation, a discrete succession of mature fluvial quartzite on the Bangweulu Block, has yielded an age of 1434 +/- 14 Ma, indicating that it is a younger Mesoproterozoic succession. A striking similarity between the detrital zircon populations in the Kasama Formation and those in the Mporokoso Group support previous sedimentological interpretations that it is a second-cycle sediment derived from the Mporokoso Group. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available