4.6 Article

Mode of growth hormone action in osteoblasts

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 282, Issue 43, Pages 31666-31674

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M705219200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR052746] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growth hormone (GH) affects bone size and mass in part through stimulating insulin-like growth factor type 1 (IGF-1) production in liver and bone. Whether GH acts independent of IGF-1 in bone remains unclear. To define the mode of GH action in bone, we have used a Cre/loxP system in which the type 1 IGF-1 receptor (Igf1r) has been disrupted specifically in osteoblasts in vitro and in vivo. Calvarial osteoblasts from mice homozygous for the floxed IGF-1R allele (IGF-1Rflox/flox) were infected with adenoviral vectors expressing Cre. Disruption of IGF-1RmRNA(> 90%) was accompanied by near elimination of IGF-1R protein but retention of GHR protein. GH-induced STAT5 activation was consistently greater in osteoblasts with an intact IGF-1R. Osteoblasts lacking IGF-1R retained GH-induced ERK and Akt phosphorylation and GH-stimulated IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 mRNA expression. GH-induced osteoblast proliferation was abolished by Cre-mediated disruption of the IGF-1R or co-incubation of cells with an IGF-1-neutralizing antibody. By contrast, GH inhibited apoptosis in osteoblasts lacking the IGF-1R. To examine the effects of GH on osteoblasts in vivo, mice wild type for the IGF-1R treated with GH subcutaneously for 7 days showed a doubling in the number of osteoblasts lining trabecular bone, whereas osteoblast numbers in similarly treated mice lacking the IGF-1R in osteoblasts were not significantly affected. These results indicate that although direct IGF1R-independent actions of GH on osteoblast apoptosis can be demonstrated in vitro, IGF-1R is required for anabolic effects of GH in osteoblasts in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available