4.6 Article

New constraints on the mid-IR EBL from the HESS discovery of VHE γ-rays from 1ES 0229+200

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 475, Issue 2, Pages L9-L13

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078462

Keywords

galaxies : BL lacertae objects : individual : 1ES 0229+200; gamma rays : observations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. To investigate the very high energy (VHE: > 100 GeV)gamma-ray emission from the high-frequency peaked BL Lac 1ES 0229+200. Methods. Observations of 1ES 0229+200 at energies above 580 GeV were performed with the High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS) in 2005 and 2006. Results. 1ES 0229+200 is discovered by HESS to be an emitter of VHE photons. A signal is detected at the 6.6 sigma level in the HESS observations (41.8 h live time). The integral flux above 580 GeV is (9.4 +/- 1.5(stat) +/- 1.9(syst)) x 10(-13) cm(-2) s(-1), corresponding to similar to 1.8% of the flux observed from the Crab Nebula. The data show no evidence for significant variability on any time scale. The observed spectrum is characterized by a hard power law (Gamma = 2.50 +/- 0.19(stat) +/- 0.10(syst)) from 500 GeV to similar to 15 TeV. Conclusions. The high-energy range and hardness of the observed spectrum, coupled with the object's relatively large redshift (z = 0.1396), enable the strongest constraints so far on the density of the Extragalactic Background Light (EBL) in the mid-infrared band. Assuming that the emitted spectrum is not harder than Gamma(int) approximate to 1.5, the HESS data support an EBL spectrum alpha lambda(-1) and density close to the lower limit from source counts measured by Spitzer, confirming the previous indications from the HEGRA data of 1ES 1426+428 ( z = 0.129). Irrespective of the EBL models used, the intrinsic spectrum of 1ES 0229+ 200 is hard, thus locating the high-energy peak of its spectral energy distribution above a few TeV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available