4.3 Article

In vitro activity of azithromycin, newer quinolones and cephalosporins in ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella causing enteric fever

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 11, Pages 1490-1494

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47353-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The therapeutic alternatives available for use against ciprofloxacin-resistant enteric fever isolates in an endemic area are limited. The antibiotics currently available are the quinolones, third-generation cephalosporins and conventional first-line drugs. In this study, the MICs of various newer drugs were determined for 31 ciprofloxacin-resistant enteric fever isolates (26 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and 5 S. enterica serovar Paratyphi A). MICs for ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, cefotaxime, cefixime, cefepime and azithromycin were determined using Etest strips and the agar dilution method. By Etest, all of the ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates had ciprofloxacin MICs >= 32 mu g ml(-1). S. Typhi showed MIC90 values of 0.50, 0.25 and 0.38 mu g ml(-1) for cefixime, cefotaxime and cefepime, respectively. For the cephalosporins, a negligible difference in MIC90 and MIC50 values for S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A was observed. A single isolate of S. Typhi showed a high azithromycin MIC of 64 mu g ml(-1). The MIC90 value for azithromycin in S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi was 24 mu g ml(-1). Gatifloxacin demonstrated lower resistance (80.8 %) compared with the other quinolones (92-100 %) in S. Typhi. The rise in MIC levels of these antimicrobials is a matter for serious concern.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available