3.8 Article

A phase I, pharmacokinetic, dosage escalation study of creatine monohydrate in subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Journal

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 508-513

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/17482961003797130

Keywords

Creatine; ALS; imaging; pharmacokinetics; biomarkers

Funding

  1. Harvard Center for Neurodegeneration and Repair
  2. ALS Therapy Alliance
  3. MGH Mallinckrodt GCRC through National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Creatine monohydrate (creatine) has potential neuroprotective properties and is a commonly used supplement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Minimum therapeutic and maximum tolerated dosages of creatine are not yet known, nor is it known what systemic plasma concentrations result from specific dosage regimens. The objectives of this study were to establish steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of creatine at several dosages, and to evaluate the effects of creatine on brain metabolites using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1-MRS). Six participants with ALS received creatine at three weekly escalating oral dosages (5, 10, and 15 g b.i.d.). Plasma creatine levels and MR spectra were obtained at baseline and with each dosage increase. Mean pre-dose steady-state creatine plasma concentrations were 20.3, 39.3, and 61.5 ug/ml at 5, 10, and 15 g b.i.d., respectively. Creatine spectra increased by 8% (p = 0.06) and glutamate + glutamine signals decreased by 17% (p = 0.039) at higher dosages. There were no safety concerns at any of the dosages. In conclusion, creatine plasma concentrations increased in a dose-dependent manner. Creatine appears to cross the blood-brain barrier, and oral administration of 15 g b.i.d. is associated with increased in vivo brain creatine concentrations and decreased glutamate concentrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available