3.8 Article

Efficacy of thalidomide for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A phase II open label clinical trial

Journal

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS
Volume 10, Issue 5-6, Pages 393-404

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/17482960802709416

Keywords

Thalidomide; tumor necrosis factor-alpha; neuroinflammation; therapy; clinical trials; survival

Funding

  1. Core Grant of the Norris Cotton Cancer Center
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA023108] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroinflammation through the cytokine, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We conducted a preliminary phase II trial of thalidomide, which reduces levels of TNF-alpha pre-transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally in vivo and has been shown to prolong disease duration and extend the lifespan of transgenic animal models of ALS. Patients who met diagnostic criteria for ALS received thalidomide at escalating doses to a target dose of 400 mg/day. The primary endpoints in the trial were the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) and pulmonary function testing (PFT) curves after nine months of thalidomide treatment that were compared to historical controls. Secondary endpoints were: survival stratified for newly diagnosed and progressive disease, toxicity, quality of life, and serum cytokine measurements. Twenty-three patients were enrolled, but only 18 were evaluable for the primary outcome. There was no improvement in the ALSFRS or PFT compared to historical controls. Thalidomide had several side-effects in our ALS patients. There was no significant shift in cytokine profile after treatment compared to baseline. In conclusion, treatment of ALS with the TNF-alpha inhibitor, thalidomide, does not appear to effectively modulate disease progression and can cause adverse effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available