4.6 Review

Sleep complaints in community-living older persons: A multifactorial geriatric syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 55, Issue 11, Pages 1853-1866

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01399.x

Keywords

insomnia; drowsiness; senescence

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [T32 AG019134-07, T32AG1934, T32 AG019134, K24 AG021507-05, K24AG021507, K24 AG021507] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In older persons, sleep complaints in the form of insomnia and daytime drowsiness are highly prevalent and are associated with adverse outcomes. The underlying mechanisms are linked to age-related declines in physiology (normal aging) and age-related increases in disease prevalence (usual aging). This article describes how normal aging leads to less-restorative sleep, characterized by reductions in homeostatic and circadian sleep, and to phase advancement of the sleep-wake cycle, characterized by older persons being more alert in the early morning but drowsier in the early evening. It also describes how usual aging leads to sleep complaints through reductions in health status, loss of physical function, and primary sleep disorders. Psychosocial influences are likewise described, and their relevance to sleep complaints is discussed. These aging-related changes are subsequently incorporated into a conceptual model that describes sleep complaints as a consequence of multiple and interdependent predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors, akin to a geriatric syndrome. The discussion concludes by applying the conceptual model to the sleep-related care of an older person with insomnia and daytime drowsiness and suggesting that the diagnostic assessment consider, in addition to primary sleep disorders, multiple domains, including medical, physical, cognitive, psychological, and social matters, with the intent of developing an overall therapeutic plan and establishing long-term follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available