4.4 Article

Three-dimensional environment renders cancer cells profoundly less susceptible to a single amino acid starvation

Journal

AMINO ACIDS
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 1221-1230

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-013-1586-x

Keywords

Single amino acid starvation; Proliferative potential; Apoptosis; Arginine; Argininosuccinate synthetase

Funding

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  2. WUMBRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased amino acid requirement of malignant cells is exploited in metabolic antitumor therapy, e.g., enzymotherapies based on arginine or methionine deprivation. However, studies on animal models and clinical trials revealed that solid tumors are much less susceptible to single amino acid starvation than could be expected from the in vitro data. We conducted a comparative analysis of the response of several tumor cell lines to single amino acid starvation in 2-D monolayer versus 3-D spheroid culture. We revealed for the first time that in comparison with monolayer culture tumor cells, spheroids are much less susceptible to the deprivation of individual amino acids (i.e., arginine, leucine, lysine or methionine). Accordingly, even after prolonged (up to 10 days) starvation, spheroid cells could readily resume proliferation when appropriate amino acid was resupplemented. In the case of arginine deprivation, similar apoptosis induction was detected both in 2-D and 3-D culture, suggesting that this process does not determine the level of tumor cell sensitivity to this kind of treatment. It was also observed that spheroids much better mimic the in vivo ability of tumor cells to utilize citrulline as arginine precursor for growth in amino acid deficient environment. We conclude that 3-D spheroid culture better reflects in vivo tumor cell response to single amino acid starvation than 2-D monolayer culture and should be used as an integral model in the studies of this type of antitumor metabolic targeting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available