4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of β-alanine supplementation on exercise performance: a meta-analysis

Journal

AMINO ACIDS
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 25-37

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-011-1200-z

Keywords

beta-Alanine supplementation; Meta-analysis; Exercise test and duration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the well-defined role of beta-alanine as a substrate of carnosine (a major contributor to H+ buffering during high-intensity exercise), beta-alanine is fast becoming a popular ergogenic aid to sports performance. There have been several recent qualitative review articles published on the topic, and here we present a preliminary quantitative review of the literature through a meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of the literature was employed to identify all studies suitable for inclusion in the analysis; strict exclusion criteria were also applied. Fifteen published manuscripts were included in the analysis, which reported the results of 57 measures within 23 exercise tests, using 18 supplementation regimes and a total of 360 participants [174, beta-alanine supplementation group (BA) and 186, placebo supplementation group (Pla)]. BA improved (P = 0.002) the outcome of exercise measures to a greater extent than Pla [median effect size (IQR): BA 0.374 (0.140-0.747), Pla 0.108 (-0.019 to 0.487)]. Some of that effect might be explained by the improvement (P = 0.013) in exercise capacity with BA compared to Pla; no improvement was seen for exercise performance (P = 0.204). In line with the purported mechanisms for an ergogenic effect of beta-alanine supplementation, exercise lasting 60-240 s was improved (P = 0.001) in BA compared to Pla, as was exercise of > 240 s (P = 0.046). In contrast, there was no benefit of beta-alanine on exercise lasting < 60 s (P = 0.312). The median effect of beta-alanine supplementation is a 2.85% (-0.37 to 10.49%) improvement in the outcome of an exercise measure, when a median total of 179 g of beta-alanine is supplemented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available