4.4 Article

Enterococcus faecalis constitutes an unusual bacterial model in lysozyme resistance

Journal

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
Volume 75, Issue 11, Pages 5390-5398

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00571-07

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lysozyme is an important and widespread compound of the host constitutive defense system, and it is assumed that Enterococcus faecalis is one of the few bacteria that are almost completely lysozyme resistant. On the basis of the sequence analysis of the whole genome of E.faecalis V583 strain, we identified two genes that are potentially involved in lysozyme resistance, EF_0783 and EF_1843. Protein products of these two genes share significant homology with Staphylococcus aureus peptidoglycan O-acetyltransferase (OatA) and Streptococcus pneumoniae N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase (PgdA), respectively. In order to determine whether EF_0783 and EF_1843 are involved in lysozyme resistance, we constructed their corresponding mutants and a double mutant. The Delta EF_0783 mutant and Delta EF_0783 Delta EF_1843 double mutant were shown to be more sensitive to lysozyme than the parental E. faecalis JH2-2 strain and Delta EF_1843 mutant were. However, compared to other bacteria, such as Listeria monocytogenes or S. pneumoniae, the tolerance of Delta EF_0783 and Delta EF_0783 Delta EF_1843 mutants towards lysozyme remains very high. Peptidoglycan structure analysis showed that EF_0783 modifies the peptidoglycan by O acetylation of N-acetyl morainic acid, while the EF_1843 deletion has no obvious effect on peptidoglycan structure under the same conditions. Moreover, the EF_0783 and EF 1843 deletions seem to significantly affect the ability of E.faecalis to survive within murine macrophages. In all, while EF_0783 is currently involved in the lysozyme resistance of E.faecalis, peptidoglycan 0 acetylation and de-N-acetylation are not the main mechanisms conferring high levels of lysozyme resistance to E.faecalis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available