3.8 Article

Quantitative d-dimer levels and the extent of venous thromboembolism in CT angiography and lower limb ultrasonography

Journal

VASA-JOURNAL OF VASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 267-274

Publisher

VERLAG HANS HUBER
DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526.36.4.267

Keywords

pulmonary embolism; d-dimer; clinical probability; deep venous thrombosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We evaluated the diagnostic yield of multidetector-row CT angiography and determined the clot burden within pulmonary vasculature as a measure of pulmonary embolism (PE) severity at different d-dimer levels and pretest clinical probabilities. Patients and methods: 254 consecutive patients referred to CT pulmonary angiography for suspected PE after d-dimer testing were grouped into clinical probability classes using Wells' score, and the frequency of PE was determined. A score representing clot burden within pulmonary vasculature was calculated from the number of obstructed segmental arteries in CT scans in a partly differing group of 96 PE positive patients. Results: The prevalence of PE increases with the d-dimer level (7% at d-dimer levels of 0.5-1 mu g/ml, reaching 90% at d-dimer levels > 9 mu g/ml; p < 0.001). D-dimer levels above 4 mu g/ml are associated with a significantly higher clot burden in pulmonary arteries (median score 11 versus 5, and 53% versus 16% of patients in the subgroup with a score > 10 points; p < 0.001), and thrombus in a main pulmonary artery was detected more frequently (37% versus 9%, p = 0.003). Similar results were obtained for distal versus proximal deep venous thromboses, detected by ultrasonography of the lower limb in a separate group of 44 patients. Conclusions: High d-dimer levels are associated with an increased prevalence of CT radiographic findings indicating extended clinically severe PE or lower limb venous thrombosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available