4.4 Article

Study of the urinary and faecal excretion of N ε-carboxymethyllysine in young human volunteers

Journal

AMINO ACIDS
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 595-602

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-011-1107-8

Keywords

Maillard reaction products; Adolescence; Intake; Urinary excretion; Faecal elimination; Carboxymethyllysine

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dietary habits of the adolescent population with a high intake of snack and fast foods mean that they consume a high rate of which in turn leads to the development of different degenerative disorders. There are few studies available on MRP absorption and metabolism. We investigated the effects of a MRP-high and a MRP-low diet on carboxymethyllysine (CML) intake and excretion in 11-14 years adolescent males. In a 2-period crossover trial, 20 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group consumed the MRP-low diet for 2 weeks, observed a 40-day washout period, and then consumed the MRP-high diet for 2 weeks. The second group received the diets in the reverse order. Subjects collected urine and faeces on the last 3 days of each dietary period. The consumption of the MRP-high diet led to a higher CML input (P < 0.05) (11.28 vs. 5.36 mg/day CML for MRP-high and -low diet, respectively). In parallel, the faecal excretion was also greater (P < 0.05) (3.52 vs. 1.23 mg/day CML, respectively) and proportional to the dietary intake. The urinary elimination of CML was not increased significantly when the MRP-high diet was consumed compared to consumption of the MRP-low diet, and was not proportional to the dietary exposure of CML. In conclusion it was shown that CML absorption and faecal excretion were highly influenced by dietary CML levels. Since the compound has long-term effects on health, an excessive intake deserves attention, especially in a population nutritionally at risk as adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available