4.4 Review

Lipid glycation and protein glycation in diabetes and atherosclerosis

Journal

AMINO ACIDS
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 1163-1170

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-010-0772-3

Keywords

Lipid glycation; Protein glycation; Diabetes; AGE; Aldehydes; Atherosclerosis

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Cultures of Japan [21590340, 20228002]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21590340] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent instrumental analyses using a hybrid quadrupole/linear ion trap spectrometer in LC-MS/MS have demonstrated that the Maillard reaction progresses not only on proteins but also on amino residues of membrane lipids such as phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), thus forming Amadori-PE (deoxy-d-fructosyl PE) as the principal products. The plasma Amadori-PE level is 0.08 mol% of the total PE in healthy subjects and 0.15-0.29 mol% in diabetic patients. Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate and pyridoxal are the most effective lipid glycation inhibitors, and the PE-pyridoxal 5'-phosphate adduct is detectable in human red blood cells. These findings are beneficial for developing a potential clinical marker for glycemic control as well as potential compounds to prevent the pathogenesis of diabetic complications and atherosclerosis. Glucose and other aldehydes, such as glyoxal, methylglyoxal, and glycolaldehyde, react with the amino residues of proteins to form Amadori products and Heynes rearrangement products. Because several advanced glycation end-product (AGE) inhibitors such as pyridoxamine and benfotiamine inhibit the development of retinopathy and neuropathy in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats, AGEs may play a role in the development of diabetic complications. In the present review, we describe the recent progress and future applications of the Maillard reaction research regarding lipid and protein modifications in diabetes and atherosclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available