4.4 Article

A role for PPARα in the regulation of arginine metabolism and nitric oxide synthesis

Journal

AMINO ACIDS
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 969-979

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-010-0797-7

Keywords

Metabolic syndrome; Amino acids; alpha-Linolenic acid; n-3 PUFA; Urea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pleiotropic effects of PPAR alpha may include the regulation of amino acid metabolism. Nitric oxide (NO) is a key player in vascular homeostasis. NO synthesis may be jeopardized by a differential channeling of arginine toward urea (via arginase) versus NO (via NO synthase, NOS). This was studied in wild-type (WT) and PPAR alpha-null (KO) mice fed diets containing either saturated fatty acids (COCO diet) or 18:3 n-3 (LIN diet). Metabolic markers of arginine metabolism were assayed in urine and plasma. mRNA levels of arginases and NOS were determined in liver. Whole-body NO synthesis and the conversion of systemic arginine into urea were assessed by using N-15(2)-guanido-arginine and measuring urinary (NO3)-N-15 and [N-15]-urea. PPAR alpha deficiency resulted in a markedly lower whole-body NO synthesis, whereas the conversion of systemic arginine into urea remained unaffected. PPAR alpha deficiency also increased plasma arginine and decreased citrulline concentration in plasma. These changes could not be ascribed to a direct effect on hepatic target genes, since NOS mRNA levels were unaffected, and arginase mRNA levels decreased in KO mice. Despite the low level in the diet, the nature of the fatty acids modulated some effects of PPAR alpha deficiency, including plasma arginine and urea, which increased more in KO mice fed the LIN diet than in those fed the COCO diet. In conclusion, PPAR alpha is largely involved in normal whole-body NO synthesis. This warrants further study on the potential of PPAR alpha activation to maintain NO synthesis in the initiation of the metabolic syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available