4.4 Article

RAD inhibition of sarcoma growth: implications for laryngeal transplantation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 375-378

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.11.003

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Laryngeal transplantation has not been widely accepted because of concerns regarding accelerated tumor recurrences in the setting of nonspecific immuno suppression. Allotransplantation could potentially be offered to patients if immunosuppressive therapy could be demonstrated to exert tumor suppressive properties. Preliminary reports have demonstrated an antiproliferative effect of everolimus (RAD), a derivative of the immunosuppressant rapamycin. Materials and methods: Forty-five 10-week-old inbred C57BL/6N (136) mice were injected subcutaneously with 1 X 10(6) MCA205 sarcoma cells. On the third postinoculation day, the mice were divided into 4 treatment groups, undergoing daily gavage with RAD at 0, 0.2, 1.0, and 5.0 mg/kg per day for 10 consecutive days. Thereafter, treatment with RAD was discontinued and tumor size was measured every 2 days during treatment and biweekly until sacrifice on the 31st postinoculation day. Whole-blood trough levels (C-min) were measured for each group. Results: Mean tumor diameter among the control animals and the mice treated with RAD 0.2 mg/kg per day demonstrated no significant difference (P > .07). Groups treated with RAD 1 and 5 mg/kg per day demonstrated significant growth inhibition between the 7th and the 23rd postinoculation days (P < .0001), with no significant differences being noted between these two groups (P > .09). Mean tumor suppressive whole-blood C-min's for the 1 and 5 mg/kg per day groups were 75.6 and 368.9 pg/mu L, respectively. Conclusions: RAD delivered at immunosuppressive doses of 1 and 5 mg/kg per day resulted in significant growth restriction of a fibrosarcoma in a murine model. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available