4.4 Article

Cleavage mechanism of the H5N1 hemagglutinin by trypsin and furin

Journal

AMINO ACIDS
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 375-382

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-007-0611-3

Keywords

trypsin; furin; H5N1 hemagglutinin; cleavage mechanism; pathogenicity

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the P. R. C [2006AA02Z305]
  2. Chinese National key research program of basic science [20773085, 30770502]
  3. Virtual Laboratory for Computational Chemistry of CNIC
  4. Supercomputing Center of CNIC
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cleavage property of hemagglutinin (HA) by different proteases was the prime determinant for influenza A virus pathogenicity. In order to understand the cleavage mechanism, molecular modeling tools were utilized to study the coupled model systems of the proteases, i.e., trypsin and furin and peptides of the cleavage sites specific to H5N1 and H1 HAs, which constitute models of HA precursor in complex with cleavage proteases. The peptide segments 'RERRRKKR down arrow G' and 'SIOSR down arrow G' from the high pathogenic H5N1 H5 and the low pathogenic H1N1 H1 cleavage sites were docking to the trypsin and furin active pockets, respectively. It was observed through the docking studies that trypsin was able to recognize and cleave both the high pathogenic and low pathogenic hemagglutinin, while furin could only cleave the high pathogenic hemagglutinin. An analysis of binding energies indicated that furin got most of its selectivity due to the interactions with P-1, P-4, and P-6, while having less interaction with P-2 and little interactions with P-3, P-5, P-7, and P-8. Some mutations of H5N1 H5 cleavage sequence fitted less well into furin and would reduce high pathogenicity of the virus. These findings hint that we should focus at the subsites P-1, P-4, and P-6 for developing drugs against H5N1 viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available