4.6 Article

Low-lying electronic states of M3O9- and M3O92- (M = MO, W)

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 111, Issue 43, Pages 11093-11099

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp074187t

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple low-lying electronic states of M3O9- and M3O92- (M = Mo, W) arise from the occupation of the near-degenerate low-lying virtual orbitals in the neutral clusters. We used density functional theory (DFT) and coupled cluster theory (CCSD(T)) with correlation consistent basis sets to study the structures and energetics of the electronic states of these anions. The adiabatic and vertical electron detachment energies (ADEs and VDEs) of the anionic clusters were calculated with 27 exchange-correlation functionals including one local spin density approximation functional, 13 generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functionals, and 13 hybrid GGA functionals, as well as the CCSD(T) method. For Mo3O9-, CCSD(T) and nearly all of the DFT exchange-correlation functionals studied predict the 2 A, state arising from the Jahn-Teller distortion due to singly occupying the degenerate e' orbital to be lower in energy than the (2)A(1)' state arising from singly occupying the nondegenerate a(1)' orbital. For W3O9-, the (2)A(1) state was predicted to have essentially the same energy as the (2)A(1)' state at the CCSD(T) level with core-valence correlation Corrections included and to be higher in energy or essentially isoenergetic with most DFT methods. The calculated VDEs from the CCSD(T) method are in reasonable agreement with the experimental values for both electronic states if estimates for the corrections due to basis set incompleteness are included. For M3O92-, the singlet state arising from doubly occupying the nondegenerate a(1)' orbital was predicted to be the most stable state for both M = Mo and W. However, whereas Mo3O92- was predicted to be less stable than Mo3O9-, W3O92- was predicted to be more stable than W3O9-.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available