4.5 Article

Unstable spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (ATTCT) • (AGAAT) repeats are associated with aberrant replication at the ATX10 locus and replication origin-dependent expansion at an ectopic site in human cells

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages 7828-7838

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01276-07

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK61458, R01 DK061458] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM053819, GM53819] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (SCA10) is associated with expansion of (ATTCT)(n) repeats (where n is the number of repeats) within the ataxin 10 (ATX10/E46L) gene. The demonstration that (ATTCT)(n) tracts can act as DNA unwinding elements (DUEs) in vitro has suggested that aberrant replication origin activity occurs at expanded (ATTCT)(n) tracts and may lead to their instability. Here, we confirm these predictions. The wild-type ATX10 locus displays inefficient origin activity, but origin activity is elevated at the expanded ATX10 loci in patient-derived cells. To test whether (ATTCT)(n) tracts can potentiate origin activity, cell lines were constructed that contain ectopic copies of the c-myc replicator in which the essential DUE was replaced by ATX10 DUEs with (ATTCT)(n). ATX10 DUES containing (ATTCT)(27) or (ATTCT)(48), but not (ATTCT)(8) or (ATTCT)(13), could substitute functionally for the c-myc DUE, but (ATTCT)(48) could not act as an autonomous replicator. Significantly, chimeric c-myc replicators containing ATX10 DUES displayed length-dependent (ATTCT)(n) instability. By 250 population doublings, dramatic two- and fourfold length expansions were observed for (ATTCT)(27) and (ATTCT)(48) but not for (ATTCT)(8) or (ATTCT)(13). These results implicate replication origin activity as one molecular mechanism associated with the instability of (ATTCT)(n) tracts that are longer than normal length.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available